LeadMagic Review 2026: API-First Enrichment with 18 Endpoints
LeadMagic is API-first with 18 endpoints, pay-for-success pricing, and MCP support. 2026 review with verified pricing model and the bimodal review caveat.
LeadMagic is the enrichment tool that chose API-first. 18 REST endpoints, sub-200ms response times, MCP support for AI agents, and pay-per-result pricing. If you build workflows in Clay, n8n, or custom code, this is probably already in your evaluation. Verified April 2026 review.
TL;DR verdict
- Great for: Engineering-led GTM teams, AI agent builders needing MCP integration, API-heavy workflows.
- Hesitate if: You need a polished UI for non-technical users or strong social proof (only 18 G2 reviews per dossier).
- Entry price: Credits from $0.007 each (verified leadmagic.io/pricing April 2026); tiered plans 2K–100K+ credits.
Pricing verified April 2026 (leadmagic.io/pricing)
LeadMagic does not use traditional named monthly plans on the pricing page. Per leadmagic.io:
- 100 trial credits free (no credit card)
- Credits start at $0.007 each
- Volume tiers: 2K, 5K, 20K, 50K, 100K
- Custom plans above 100K
- Annual plans include 2 months free
- Pay-per-result model (credits consumed by valid results; 1 credit per valid email, 0.25 credits per validation)
Dossier listed named tiers (Basic $59.99, Essential $99.99, Growth $180, Professional $425, Ultimate $800) that were not visible on the pricing page in April 2026. These may be internal tier names shown at checkout or on sales calls.
What works
- MCP support. First enrichment tool to support Model Context Protocol for AI agent integration.
- Sub-200ms API. Fast enough for real-time enrichment in cold outreach flows.
- 18 REST endpoints. Email, mobile, company, LinkedIn, website visitor ID in one API.
- Pay-per-result. Credits only spent on valid results.
Where it falls down
- Bimodal reviews. G2 shows 83% five-star and 16% one-star (per dossier) – users either love it or hate it.
- Mobile number accuracy issues. One G2 reviewer cited <15/100 accurate mobile numbers.
- Cancellation friction. Billing complaints noted in dossier.
- Small review base. 18 reviews on G2 is directionally useful, not statistically significant.
Who should buy
- AI agent teams building with MCP-compatible tools
- Engineering-led GTM orgs running custom enrichment pipelines
- Clay users wanting a low-cost waterfall step at scale
Caveats worth an editor's eye
- leadmagic.io/pricing April 2026 does not display named tier plan prices. The specific tier prices in the dossier ($59.99, $99.99, etc.) should be verified with LeadMagic directly.
- G2 4.2/5 (18 reviews, bimodal) per dossier; not re-verified.
- LeadMagic's published 97% accuracy is vendor-sourced; dossier notes third-party estimates of 75–85% in practice.
- Website Visitor ID is a separate product ($75–$499/mo per dossier, not re-verified).
Keep reading
All posts →- APR 21, 2026 · signal-driven outbound tools 2026
Best Signal-Driven Outbound Tools for B2B 2026
Seven signal-driven outbound tools for B2B in 2026. Multi-source detection, LinkedIn engagement, intent data, and visitor ID compared.
Read - APR 21, 2026 · outreach vs salesloft 2026
Outreach vs Salesloft 2026: Enterprise Sales Engagement Compared
Outreach or Salesloft for enterprise sales engagement in 2026? Side-by-side on sequences, conversation intelligence, and deal management.
Read - APR 21, 2026 · satellyte vs zoominfo 2026
Satellyte vs ZoomInfo 2026: Warm Signals vs Enterprise Data
Satellyte or ZoomInfo in 2026? Affordable signal detection vs enterprise B2B data platform. Two different bets on what drives pipeline.
Read
